July 9, 2009
After months of hounding President Barack Obama as someone who “spends too much, taxes too much and borrows too much,” the GOP is trying a new approach: Democrats are job killers.
House Republican leaders used the argument during the debate over the Democrats’ climate change bill, House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) urged members before the Fourth of July recess to pound Democrats on jobs at home over the recess, and Boehner signaled this week that Republicans will use the jobs issue again as the House turns to health care reform.
“In the midst of this recession, Republicans’ No. 1 priority is the same as the American people’s: jobs,” Boehner said in a statement to POLITICO. “Yet, again and again, rather than working together to enact policies that will actually help middle-class families and small businesses, Democrats have pushed policies — on energy and health care, for example — that will cost even more American jobs.”
July 8, 2009
The last time the CIA and Nancy Pelosi were in the news together, the House Speaker was accusing the agency of lying about its briefings to Congress on the interrogation of al Qaeda detainees. This week, the Speaker’s fellow Democrats are set to block public disclosure of what Ms. Pelosi was really told and when.
Democrats recently marked up the 2010 intelligence bill, and Republican Pete Hoekstra offered an amendment in committee to require the CIA to make public an unclassified version of its records on Congressional briefings. It also would have required the CIA to disclose the information gleaned from those interrogations.
Democrats have spent years demanding a “truth commission” into interrogations, so you’d think such public disclosure would be welcome. Ah, that was when a different guy was in the White House and before Mrs. Pelosi had made her own veracity an issue. Suddenly, she’s all for secrecy.
July 8, 2009
People close to Sarah Palin say national political reporters and pundits have missed the real reasons for her surprising decision to resign as Alaska governor. The national media have dismissed or downplayed her real motives, which had little to do with any plans to run for president in 2012.
Contrary to most reports, her decision had been in the works for months, accelerating recently as it became clear that controversies and endless ethics investigations were threatening to overshadow her legislative agenda. “Attacks inside Alaska and largely invisible to the national media had paralyzed her administration,” someone close to the governor told me. “She was fully aware she would be branded a ‘quitter.’ She did not want to disappoint her constituents, but she was no longer able to do the job she had been elected to do. Essentially, the taxpayers were paying for Sarah to go to work every day and defend herself.”
This situation developed because Alaska’s transparency laws allow anyone to file Freedom of Information Act requests. While normally useful, in the hands of political opponents FOIA requests can become a means to bog down a target in a bureaucratic quagmire, thanks to the need to comb through records and respond by a strict timetable. Similarly, ethics investigations are easily triggered and can drag on for months even if the initial complaint is flimsy. Since Ms. Palin returned to Alaska after the 2008 campaign, some 150 FOIA requests have been filed and her office has been targeted for investigation by everyone from the FBI to the Alaska legislature. Most have centered on Ms. Palin’s use of government resources, and to date have turned up little save for a few state trips that she agreed to reimburse the state for because her children had accompanied her. In the process, though, she accumulated $500,000 in legal fees in just the last nine months, and knew the bill would grow ever larger in the future.
July 8, 2009
It got little attention, but a recent legal decision could be a game-changer in Florida politics.
The state’s top elections official, Secretary of State Kurt Browning, ended a legal fight over a state law that requires the public to know who is behind — and who is bankrolling — television and radio ads and direct-mail fliers that sharply attack or praise politicians.
Browning decided not to appeal a federal court’s ruling in May that declared the state’s regulation of these outside groups was unconstitutional.
Florida’s decision not to appeal the case signaled to some that the state has given up the fight to try to control money-driven politics.